Thursday, October 27, 2022

The "What time is it?" Cancel: Commercial Stock Company

Neither David Thompson or I can find much on the Commercial Stock Company.  Likely located in Boston, though there is a Water Street in the financial district of New York.  Whatever the case, the cancel is an interesting one, with a time but no date other than the year.  Or am I missing something?





Sunday, October 23, 2022

Cotton Brokers: Gassner & Company


GASSNER & CO.
FEB  9 190x
New Orleans, La

For years I've had the Degas painting, Cotton Exchange, posted on this website.  The painting was done in my home town of New Orleans, a major cotton center and port.  Degas spent parts of 1872 and 1873 in the city.  The painting shows men examining cotton samples at a large table, presumably to make decisions regarding large purchases of cotton for industrial buyers, both domestic and overseas.  Others in the painting are individually examining cotton samples, reading a newspaper, or engaging in other cotton trade functions.

It is possible that one or more of the men in the painting were conducting business on behalf of Gassner & Company, a Liverpool-based cotton merchant.  I'm no expert in the tax laws of 1898, so I am not sure of the exact types of taxes this $1 stamp might have paid.  However, Gassner would have been active buyers, warehousers, and shippers of cotton.  The process, likely including exchanging pounds for dollars, would have involved taxable events.  If the stamp was still on its document, the use of the stamp would be clear.  But for now, we have an interesting relic of the cotton trade in New Orleans.


Thursday, October 20, 2022

Industrial Cancels: Bay City Sugar Company


BAY CITY
JUL   6   1901
SUGAR CO.

Thanks to David Thompson for sending in another sugar-related cancel.  

Historical marker in Essexville, Bay County, Michigan:







Sunday, October 16, 2022

Stock Brokers Reorganize: From Brown, Bruns & Company to Seneca D. Brown & Company

At the beginning of the 1898 tax period, Seneca D. Brown, Edwin G. Bruns and William Freudenstein were partners in the NYSE brokerage firm Brown, Bruns & Company.  Among them, only Edwin Bruns held a seat on the exchange.  By 1901, however, Brown, Bruns was no longer listed as a firm.  Edwin Bruns would still be listed as holding a seat, but without a firm. Meanwhile that year, Seneca D. Brown would create his own firm, with what appears to be his son, Frederick W. Brown.


The following memorandum of sale shows Brown Bruns still trading as of late 1900.  


300 shares of Southern Railway @ $13 3/8 sold to Eames & Moore on Nov 7, 1900


I have no sale memo for Seneca D. Brown's self-named firm, but the stamp below, likely used in 1901, has the initials of his firm for a cancel:
S.D.B & ?
SEP 30 ????

Frederick W. Brown held a seat on the NYSE by 1901 and was the Seneca D. Brown firm's seated partner.

I'm still looking for cancel evidence of Mr. Bruns and his trading activity.


Thursday, October 13, 2022

1898 Dow Industrials Components: American Sugar Refining Company

Incorporated in 1887, the American Sugar Refining Company would become one of the original 12 companies in the Dow Industrials Stock Index when it was created in 1896.  By 1907 the firm owned or controlled 98% of sugar refining capacity in the United States.  I've yet to learn what American Sugar transactions that might have taken place during the 1898-1902 tax period that might have required the stamp below, though the firm was very active with corporate acquisitions that might have required documentary stamps.



AMERICAN
SUGAR REF. CO.
JUN 2XXX

scan courtesy of David Thompson

Meanwhile, trading in American Sugar Refining was very active, as it was one of the largest companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  A few examples of those trades are provided below:


Charles Head memorandum of sale to D. Bacon.
100 shares of American Sugar @129.00 on Dec 29, 1899

American Sugar Refining was big and dominant enough that the simple "sugar" moniker was all that was necessary on the share line.


J. H. Griesel memorandum of sale to Eames & Moore on behalf of G P. Mellick.
100 shares of American Sugar @ 102.25 on Mar 5 1900



Pearl & Co memorandum of sale to Eames & Moore.
100 shares of American Sugar @ 135.50.  no date.

Sunday, October 9, 2022

Fugitive Ink and Scott #R183


Unused Scott R183, $3 Lake block of 4,
 with fugitive ink that's yet to go fugitive

"It wasn't me, it was the one-armed man!" said Harrison Ford's character, Dr. Richard Kimble, in the film The Fugitive.  Kimble, falsely convicted for the murder of his wife, escapes a prison bus and leads the police on a 90 minute chase scene while he works to prove it was in fact the one-armed man who did it.  R183 isn't nearly as exciting.  But the stamp was printed with something called fugitive ink.  So it does have something in common with Dr. Kimble.  R183 is uncommon, and few collectors have more than one copy if any at all in which to compare stamps and color condition.  So for many collectors, the only reason for awareness of the use of fugitive ink on this stamp comes from two entries for R183 in the recent versions of the Scott US Specialized Catalogue: 1) After the entry for the color of the stamp, which is the color lake, is the entry "fugitive ink" in parentheses;  and 2) the little note at the bottom of the entry for R183 that says, Warning: The ink on No. R183 will run in water.  There is no further elaboration or comment.  

Over the years I've managed to accumulate the unused block of four above.  I also have a few used copies off-piece with which to examine the fugitive quality of the ink.  The conditions of the used stamps exposed to water are all very different.  Prompting this post was a stamp recently sent to me by David Thompson -- it is the stamp at the bottom left in the examples below.  This stamp is clearly one that has been affected by the combination of water and fugitive ink to make the ink run, much like the stamp on the bottom on the right, which is even lighter in color.  The two bottom stamps are no longer lake in color.  

The top four stamps represent a progression in just how fugitive the ink can be.  The stamp on the upper left, with the "ATCH" cancel (a cancel for the broker William D. Hatch), appears to have never seen any water.  The second scan shows the back of all the stamps, in the same sequence as the scan showing the front of the stamps.  By looking at its back, it appears that Mr. Hatch's stamp was removed without any water -- gum remains and some of the original document is still attached.  So the stamp appears much as the block of four above.  







The top right stamp shows some fading, but its back shows what almost appear to be bloody scars of the ink that has run through the cut cancel while the lake color in front is largely retained.  The middle stamp on the right is lighter appearing on the front than the stamp above it, yet the reddishness of the cut cancel is not as great.  Oddly, the perfined stamp at the lower right has no bleeding appearance around the edge of the perfins, though the ink ran on this stamp more than any other.  And lastly, the bottom left stamp has its back stained pink from the fugitive ink, which hasn't happened on the other 4 stamps that were likely soaked at some point.  

How could soaking produce so many different results?  What is going on here?  Scott's note tells us that think ink will run in water.  But all these stamps represent very different outcomes from a soak.

Consulting Richard Friedberg, I received this answer as a possible explanation for the different conditions of these stamps:  

"if the stamp is carefully put face up in a shallow dish not much water gets to the side with the ink and it doesn't run much if at all. If the stamp remains face down for a longer period in water it will run a bit/a lot."  

So this answer could very well be the explanation I'm looking for.  But what it doesn't help explain is the opaqueness of Scott's note.  Maybe a catalog is not the place to explain how to manage a stamp like this with an unusual and idiosyncratic ink.  But the note only demands that more questions be asked, and that leaves the collector hanging.  For many, a used R183 off cover with little sign of ink fading or dispersion creates nothing but questions.  Just a brief note as to how off-cover, varyingly damaged stamps might exist would be a good idea for the catalogue for two reasons: 1) to explain what we see in the examples above; and 2) to explain how one might safely remove examples from documents in the future (don't do this please - R183s are so much better on document - unless you must).

Lastly, I have a 1971 copy of the Scott US Specialized catalogue.  There is no mention of fugitive ink or its tendency to run when in contact with water.  Maybe old-time revenue collectors just knew these kinds of things.

Thursday, October 6, 2022

Stock Brokers Reorganize: Chauncey Brothers & Company becomes Chauncey & Company

On Sunday, this site highlighted the split in the firm of McIntyre & Marshall during the 1898 tax period.  In that case, the partners in the firm created two new firms out of the one.  Today is presented the case of Chauncey Brothers, who, because of the death of a brother, the firm was reorganized and renamed.



CHAUNCEY BROS & CO.
OCT
13
1898
NEW YORK


By July 1898, the brothers Daniel and Samuel Chauncey ran a Wall Street brokerage firm called Chauncey Brothers & Company.  The brothers each held their own seats on the exchange, with Daniel admitted in 1881 and Samuel admitted in 1885.  The firm used an oval date stamp to cancel their stamps.  They also must have been a firm that specialized in smaller trades (those less than one hundred shares), as many of the cancels that I have seen from their firm are on the battleship stamps.

In August 1899, Samuel S. Chauncey died after a protracted illness.  He passed away in Colorado Springs, as he was traveling to the west and south on the advice of his physician, likely to escape the cold of New York.  His brother Daniel continued to hold his seat at the New York Stock Exchange and continued trading, though he renamed the firm Chauncey & Company.  I do not know when the name change took place, though by July 1900 his firm was listed by the name Chauncey & Co.


CHAUNCEY & CO.
JAN
27
1902

Look for "Chauncey" cancels among your battleships.  You may have one by the brothers or by Daniel's newer firm.





Sunday, October 2, 2022

Stock Brokers Reorganize: McIntyre & Wardwell becomes McIntyre & Marshall and Wardwell & Adams


McI. & W. and McI. & M.


WARDWELL & ADAMS


Over the course of the 1898 tax period (July 1, 1898 - June 30, 1902), many brokerage firms in New York closed up shop, opened for business, or reorganized under new names.  The changes meant new and different cancels over the 4 year period.  The stamps above represent one such case.  

As we've observed on this site before, the majority of dollar value 1898 stamps were used in New York, mostly at the New York Stock Exchange.  For the stamp on the upper left, the cancel indicates that McI. & W. was located in New York, making it almost certain that the firm represented by those initials traded at the NYSE.  A quick look at the list of members from 1898 of the NYSE shows a firm called McIntyre & Wardwell, and it does so because in the list of 1100 members with seats on the exchange, a Mr. Edward L. Adams, and partner of McIntyre & Wardwell, comes first alphabetically.  Henry Wardwell is also listed as having a seat, though there is no Thomas McIntyre among the members.

It appears that this arrangement, with the three gentlemen in partnership, operated in 1898 through sometime in late 1900 or early 1901 when a change was made.  Thus, the McI. & W. cancel can be found on stamps canceled in 98, 99, 00 and possibly 01.

Thomas A. McIntyre, the senior partner of McIntyre & Wardwell, would reorganize himself and his firms many times over his career.  When he broke up McIntyre & Wardwell, he found a new partner in James Marshall, who in 1898 was not listed as having a seat on the exchange.  Meanwhile, the two members of the old firm created a new self-named firm.  So through 1901 to the end of the tax period in 1902 we can find cancels for the firms McIntyre & Marshall and Wardwell & Adams.

McIntyre came to be known as "the great organizer" of Wall Street, but business troubles led to the bankrupty of his firm and subsequent indictment for larceny.






 

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Henry M. North, Insurance Agent

 

HENRY M. NORTH
AGENT
JAN 28 1901
AUGUSTA, GA.


Henry M. North advertisement from an Augusta, Georgia high school yearbook.  Buy those whole life policies when you are young!

Unusual circular date stamp, especially from an insurance broker.

Sunday, September 25, 2022

Errington & Martin, Stamp Importers

Errington & Martin, Stamp Importers:  the 1898 Revenues Edition!


The battleship revenue stamp above appears to have a fuzzy and illegible handstamp cancel that renders the stamp barely interesting as a collectible item.  However, further inspection changes everything.  Turn the stamp over, and a clear and intriguing "cancel" appears:



ERRINGTON & MARTIN
STAMP
IMPORTERS,
SOUTH
HACKNEY
- N.E.-

Just a glance makes it clear that this is not a cancel but a backstamp applied by a stamp dealer, likely located in the United Kingdom.  The stamp is nothing pretty, but the backstamp makes an interesting and collectible philatelic item.

London-based Edgar Frank Errington and Benjamin Ernest Marten were late 19th and early 20th century British stamp dealers who specialized in importing foreign stamps.  Their business as a partnership lasted until 1919, when Benjamin Martin took over all operations.  

The firm backstamped stamps from all over the world, and there are many examples still in existence.  For example, this 2 cent Columbian, which shows they published stamp albums in addition to importing the stamps to fill them:

 


STAMP ALBUMS
AT ALL PRICES
ILLUSTRATED LIST
POST FREE & GRATIS
ERRINGTON & MARTIN
LONDON, N. E.

A 2009 Stampboards thread has a very interesting discussion on this subject and many more examples of Errington and Martin backstamps.

Thursday, September 22, 2022

Printed Cancels by the Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railroad?

A corresponding collector in Minnesota sent me examples of cancellations, possibly printed, by the Duluth, Missabe, & Iron Range Railroad, a railroad organized to transport iron ore and eventually taconite out of the Minnesota iron range to port facilities on Lake Superior at Duluth, Minnesota.  I was immediately interested in these, as examples of these cancels don't appear in Richard Fullerton's catalog, and the DM&IRR was not a part of any of the families of railroads known to use printed cancels.  



At first glance the cancels on the three stamps collectively make it appear that we could have printed cancels, as the cancels are all roughly in the same place on the stamps.  But with a bit of scrutiny it seemed that the cancels might even be complete fakes.  First, it seems likely they were not printed, as the cancels appear at differing angles on each stamp.  Second, the stamps indicate no sign of legitimate use, with dates or handstamps or normal manuscript cancelling.  Third, the ink has run and blurred across all the stamps.  The AMEX printed cancels show this blurred quality for stamps cancelled with older plates, but there is no evidence anywhere that the DM&IRRR cancelled enough stamps to wear out their cancelling devices.  

It appears to me that the maker of the cancels used a pile of cheap stamps - a 1c stamp, a pencil canceled 2c with a slight tear, and 25c with cut cancels, to add handstamp cancels.




It appears that at best we have philatelic mischief, or at worst fraud, committed sometime after 1937.

A little research showed that the DM&IRR was organized and so named in 1937, 35 years after the 1898 tax period expired.  On July 1, 1937, the Duluth, Missabe and Northern Ry (DM&N) and the Spirit Lake Transfer Railway were merged to form the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway.  There is a reference called “History of the Missabe” published by the Missabe Railroad Historical Society that goes into this merger and the creation of the DM&IRR.

To cross check it, I went to a contemporaneous reference, the Poor’s Manual of Railroads (image below) from 1901, that lists all US Class I, II, III railroads.  There is no DM&IRR in the manual, but there are the Duluth & Iron Range RR, and the Duluth, Missabe & Northern Ry.

The mischief maker didn’t even bother to create fake cancels for a real, existing railroad during the time of the 1898 tax period.  At least we know that the fakes were made after 1937.  But that’s about all.  Whatever the case, these are an interesting philatelic story.  The collector that sent these stamps to me reported that he had seen a stamp with these cancels sold in an auction a few years ago.  While he did not win that auction lot, he did buy examples of these cancels from a collection located in Walnut Grove, Minnesota sometime in the last few years.  Buyer beware!





Sunday, September 18, 2022

New York Stock Brokers: Clarence S. Day Sr. and Jr. and "Life with Father"

Clarence Day Sr. was the head of his eponymous brokerage firm in New York during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, where his son, Clarence Jr also briefly worked (and did so during the 1898 tax period).  Clarence Sr. would become the inspiration for one of Broadway's longest running and successful plays, Life with Father, written by Clarence Jr.  But before the book was written that would inspire the play, Sr and Jr conspired to buy and sell stocks, of which one of those transactions is represented by the $10 stamp below:

C. S. D. & CO.
APR
2?
1902

Stamp and cancel identification courtesy of David Thompson.  Stamp shows clear evidence that it was soaked in water to remove it from a document; the square of soluble varnish dissolved in the process and took with it some of the cancel and the $10 overprint.



Clarence S. Day Sr.



Clarence S. Day Jr.

Author and illustrator Clarence Day, best known for his book Life With Father, was born in New York City on November 18, 1874. He graduated from Yale College in 1896, then worked in his father's brokerage house and served briefly in the U. S. Navy. In 1898 he was stricken with rheumatoid arthritis. He traveled for some years in search of a cure, then settled in New York, where he became active in the alumni affairs of Yale College and launched his writing career. Day's essays, book reviews, short stories, verses and cartoons appeared regularly during the 1910s-30s in Harper's Magazine, The New Republic, The Metropolitan Magazine, The New York American, and The New Yorker. His first book, This Simian World, was published in 1920. Day achieved his greatest popularity during the 1930s with the publication of Life With Father, a series of comic memoirs of family life. Clarence Day died of pneumonia on December 28, 1935. (From the description of Clarence Day papers, 1796-1993, (bulk dates 1890-1935). (New York Public Library)).

The play was also made into a film:



Thursday, September 15, 2022

New York Stock Brokers: Zimmerman & Forshay



In the membership lists of the New York Stock Exchange from 1898 through 1902, the firm of Zimmerman and Forshay come last, the usual fate of anyone whose name begins with a "Z".  There are few Zs in the lists of firms and members of the NYSE during the 1898 tax period, making cancel identification for Zimmerman and Forshay rather simple.  This is but one of 100s of firms identified as users of the 1898 series revenue stamps.

Over the past few months, David Thompson and I have been working on a comprehensive list of NYSE members that could have used stamps during the 1898 tax period.  There is still much work to do, as each list has 1100 individual members (many fewer firms though) and there are 5 relevant lists to include: 98, 99, 00, 01 and 02.  Conveniently for collectors of 1898 revenues, the membership of the NYSE ran mid-year to mid-year, coinciding with the initial use of the stamps in 1898.  Once the comprehensive list is more complete, we'll publish the document for the use of others.  

Meanwhile, I'll keep posting firms that we've identified along the way, through the use of the NYSE membership lists and King's Views of the New York Stock Exchange.

So far, we've only been able to identify Zimmerman and Forshay by their "Z. & F." cancel.  




Z. & F.
NOV
23
1901



Friday, May 28, 2021

1/8 Cent Proprietary with 50 Cent Beer Stamp Impressions

While there was an 1898 series of beer stamps, the stamps and the taxes they paid were not for the purpose of supporting the war effort, as they accounted to more general revenues for the US Treasury.  However, the Bureau of Engraving and printing was producing both the ongoing series of beer stamps while printing the battleship and other associated war stamps.  In their hurry to produce the new stamps and the ongoing series, they occasionally made a mistake.  This post presents an interesting example of one of those errors.

Frank Sente has supplied a block of the 1/8 cent proprietary that has non-inked vignettes of the REA60 beer stamp visible in the margin.  As a reminder, REA60 looks like this, with an image of Thomas Hart Benson in the center:



Below is a bottom right margin imprint and plate number 9437 block of twenty of RB20 wherein you can faintly see two vignette impressions of the REA60 federal beer stamp in the margin.



A cropped image from the block showing the BEP margin imprint and the lower of the two REA vignette image:


Frank ran the cropped image through a program called RetroReveal to "strenghten" the image of the REA60 vignette.    The vignette is inverted.  At the top you can read ..."rter Barr".. of Quarter Barrel above the recognizable image of Thomas Hart Benson's head with "Fifty Cents" below that. 




Thanks to Frank for sharing this.  If there is this one, there must be others.  Examine your battleships closely!

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Industrial Cancels: The General Manifold Company

Back after a month -- been a bit busy with another project.  Lots of material has come in that is worth working through and posting, so we'll see how the next few weeks go.  Today's entry is from David Thompson, who has shared a pair of R187s with a cancel from The General Manifold Company:


FRANKLIN,  PA.
THE GENERAL MANIFOLD COMPANY,
O.  D.  BLEAKLEY,  Treas'r.
APR  23  1901                        APR 23  1901

When I first saw this cancel I assumed that the company was involved in the manufacture of engine manifolds.  Seemed like a muscular and needed business during the age of steel and railroads back at the turn of the century.  Turns out that the business produced a form of carbon paper that would allow businesses to make ready copies of its documents.  In particular, the company produced carbon paper products for railroads, and there are feature articles in various railroad publications from the time on the company and its product.  Their business was big enough that they built a large plant in Franklin, Pennsylvania to produce their office supplies:

The General Manifold Company plant, Franklin, PA

A brief description of the company's activity can be found in the 1904 edition of Railway and Locomotive Engineering: