- Home
- About
- Documentary Printed Precancels
- The Fullerton List
- NYSE Brokers 1898-1902 A thru K
- NYSE Brokers 1898 - 1902 L thru Z
- Insurance Agents
- Insurance Companies
- CBOT
- Railroads
- On-document Uses with Frank Sente
- Revenue Stamped Paper with Bob Hohertz
- On Beyond Holcombe with Malcolm Goldstein
- Graded Stamps
Sunday, January 19, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: Forwood & O'Neill of Paris, Texas
Saturday, January 18, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: Henry Hentz & Company
Thursday, January 16, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: Cox and Callender of New York
Tuesday, January 14, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: Baily & Montgomery of New York
Sunday, January 12, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: S. Munn, Son & Company of New York
Saturday, January 11, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: Louis De Gumoens & Son of New York
Thursday, January 9, 2025
Cotton Broker Cancels: W. A. Short of Helena, Arkansas
Tuesday, January 7, 2025
Thursday, April 27, 2023
Baily & Montgomery, Commission Merchants
Saturday, March 18, 2023
Cotton Brokers: Weld & Neville
Saturday, March 11, 2023
Cotton Brokers: J. H. Parker & Company
Saturday, February 11, 2023
Cotton Brokers: Mohr, Hanemann & Company
New York Times, June 22, 1918:
Saturday, January 28, 2023
Cotton Brokers: Lehman Brothers
Lehman Brothers are most famous as a New York financial firm that crashed and burned during the 2008 financial crisis. I'm not a scholar of their collapse but I would assume they speculated just a bit too much on the long side of mortgage derivatives. But while the firm grew in the 20th century to become a major player in finance, their origins were a bit more humble, as they began as southern "cotton factors" that brokered cotton between producers and American and European industrial buyers.
Thursday, January 12, 2023
Cotton Brokers: Gwathmey & Company
Tuesday, December 20, 2022
Bill of Exchange Fragments: American Cotton Company
Reverse side of document fragment:
Front of document fragment with British five shilling tax stamp:
Sunday, October 23, 2022
Cotton Brokers: Gassner & Company
For years I've had the Degas painting, Cotton Exchange, posted on this website. The painting was done in my home town of New Orleans, a major cotton center and port. Degas spent parts of 1872 and 1873 in the city. The painting shows men examining cotton samples at a large table, presumably to make decisions regarding large purchases of cotton for industrial buyers, both domestic and overseas. Others in the painting are individually examining cotton samples, reading a newspaper, or engaging in other cotton trade functions.
It is possible that one or more of the men in the painting were conducting business on behalf of Gassner & Company, a Liverpool-based cotton merchant. I'm no expert in the tax laws of 1898, so I am not sure of the exact types of taxes this $1 stamp might have paid. However, Gassner would have been active buyers, warehousers, and shippers of cotton. The process, likely including exchanging pounds for dollars, would have involved taxable events. If the stamp was still on its document, the use of the stamp would be clear. But for now, we have an interesting relic of the cotton trade in New Orleans.
Sunday, January 20, 2013
New Orleans Stock Brokers and Cotton Factors: H. Abraham & Son
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Cotton "Factors": Heard Brothers
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Cotton Buyers: Smith & Coughlan
Birmingham, Anniston, Gadsden, Huntsville, Decatur, Tuscaloosa and Bessemer
THEIR MANUFACTURING AND MERCANTILE INDUSTRIES, HISTORY, PROGRESS, AND DEVELOPMENT
NEW YORK AND BIRMINGHAM
Southern Commercial Publishing Company.
1888.
With ample cash to buy, Messrs. Smith & Coughlan are prepared to make liberal advances on cotton. They have another office at Gadsden, Alabama, in connection with the cotton business. Mr. F. G. Smith is a native of Nashville, Tennessee. He has been engaged in the steamboat business for many years. He is well known in the city as President of the South Anniston Land Company. His partner, Mr. J. H. Coughlan, is a native of Boston.
Their long experience in the business, with their extensive correspondence and acquaintance with the cotton markets of the world, has fitted them to realize good prices for cotton, which brings them the most liberal orders. The firm is a leading one in the cotton trade, and is entitled to the confidence of the readers of the history of Birmingham, who have orders of cotton to give, and desire a good firm, possessed of executive ability in this line of business.
This is but a brief account of a firm which, in every way, is worthy of the success it has attained, and the esteem in which it is held by the entire communitv.
CLIFTON MANUFACTURING:
From the Textile History website:
Clifton Manufacturing Company was incorporated January 19, 1880 with a capital stock of $200,000 (1). Mills at this time were normally built along rivers where a change in slope gave opportunity to harness water power. With prior experience downstream on the Pacolet River, Edgar Converse, a native of Swanton, Vermont, organized cotton mill at Hurricane Shoals. The noted engineering firm of Lockwood Greene was selected to design the mill. Clifton Mill No. 1 (named or the cliffs overlooking the Pacolet), began manufacturing in 1881 with 7,000 spindles, 144 looms and 600 operatives, who lived in the nearby mill village. (2)
The company prospered and authorized another mill in August 1887. The new mill, named Clifton No. 2 was located just downriver on Cannon’s Shoals. Construction began in 1888 and began production in 1889 with 21,512 spindles, a three-fold increase over No. 1. Early products for these mills included sheeting, drills, and print cloth.
In May 1895, management authorized a third mill to be located just north of mill No. 1. This mill, Clifton No. 3, would have 34,944 spindles and 1092 looms. Albert H. Twichell succeeded Edgar Converse as president of Clifton Manufacturing upon the death of Mr. Converse in May, 1899. Clifton No. 3 opened in 1900.
he Flood of 1903: A devastating flood on June 6, 1903 tore through the valley and caused havoc. One witness said of Clifton No. 3, “The five-story, 50,000-spindle mill trembled for a while, then gave way, a wall of water rose 40 feet in minutes. Mill No. 1 was next in line. The entire mill village within 100 feet of the river was destroyed. One-third of the mill disappeared. When the water reached No. 2, it took away half the four-story mill.” (3)
Sources:
1. Teter, Betsy Wakefield, editor. 2002. Textile Town Spartanburg County, South Carolina, Hub City
Writers Project, Spartanburg ISBN 1-891885-28-6 Appendix.
2. Mike Hembree, The Birth of Clifton – Boom Town on the Pacolet
3. William M. Branham, The Flood of 1903 –Terror Along the Pacolet River p 77














































